Generalized spatial structural equation models
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Generalized spatial structural equation models.
It is common in public health research to have high-dimensional, multivariate, spatially referenced data representing summaries of geographic regions. Often, it is desirable to examine relationships among these variables both within and across regions. An existing modeling technique called spatial factor analysis has been used and assumes that a common spatial factor underlies all the variables...
متن کاملGeneralized Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling
A unifying framework for generalized multilevel structural equation modeling is introduced. The models in the framework, called generalized linear latent and mixed models (GLLAMM), combine features of generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) and structural equation models (SEM) and consist of a response model and a structural model for the latent variables. The response model generalizes GLMMs to...
متن کاملStructural Equation Models: Mixture Models
This article discusses a modelling framework that links two well-known statistical methods: structural equation modelling (SEM) and latent class or finite mixture modelling. This hybrid approach was proposed independently by Arminger and Stein [1], Dolan and Van der Maas [4], and Jedidi, Jagpal and DeSarbo [5]. Here, we refer to this approach as mixture SEM or latent class SEM. There are two di...
متن کاملBayesian Inference for Spatial Beta Generalized Linear Mixed Models
In some applications, the response variable assumes values in the unit interval. The standard linear regression model is not appropriate for modelling this type of data because the normality assumption is not met. Alternatively, the beta regression model has been introduced to analyze such observations. A beta distribution represents a flexible density family on (0, 1) interval that covers symm...
متن کاملStructural Equation Models
Although the literature on alternatives to effect indicators is growing, there has been little attention given to evaluating causal and composite (formative) indicators. This paper provides an overview of this topic by contrasting ways of assessing the validity of effect and causal indicators in structural equation models (SEMs). It also draws a distinction between composite (formative) indicat...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Biostatistics
سال: 2005
ISSN: 1468-4357,1465-4644
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxi026